The gamma-ray source AGL J2241+4454 as the possible counterpart of MWC 656

TL;DR

This study investigates gamma-ray emissions from the binary system MWC 656, exploring archival data from AGILE and Fermi/LAT, and finds multiple transient events with AGILE but not with Fermi, suggesting observational biases.

Contribution

It provides the first detailed analysis of gamma-ray transient events associated with MWC 656 using archival data, highlighting differences between AGILE and Fermi observations.

Findings

Nine transient gamma-ray events detected by AGILE.

No significant orbital phase correlation found.

Differences in instrument exposure may explain observational discrepancies.

Abstract

The AGILE satellite discovered the transient source AGL J2241+4454 in 2010 which triggered the study of the associated field allowing for the discovery of the first Be/black hole binary system: MWC 656. This binary was suggested to be the counterpart of AGL J2241+4454, but this is still not a firm association. In this work we explore the archival AGILE and Fermi/LAT data in order to find more transient events originating in the field of AGL J2241+4454 and address the possibility to link them to the accretion/ejection processes of MWC 656. We found a total of 9 other transient events with AGILE compatible with the position of AGL J2241+4454, besides the one from 2010. We folded this events with the period of the binary system and we did not find significant results that allow us to associate the gamma-ray activity to any particular orbital phase. By stacking the 10 transient events we obtained a spectrum that extends between 100 MeV and 1 GeV, and we fitted it with a power law with photon index {\Gamma} = 2.3 +/- 0.2. We searched into the Fermi /LAT data in order to complement the gamma-ray information provided by AGILE but no significant results arose. In order to investigate this apparent contradiction between the two gamma-ray telescopes, we studied the exposure of the field of AGL J2241+4454 in both instruments finding significant differences. In particular, AGILE exposed for longer time and at lower off-axis angle distance the field of AGL J2241+4454. This fact, together with the energy dependent sensitivity of both instruments, and the soft spectrum found in the stacking analysis, might explain why AGILE observed the transient events not seen by Fermi/LAT.