Can we remove the systematic error due to isotropic inhomogeneities?
Hiroyuki Negishi, Ken-ichi Nakao

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether large-scale isotropic inhomogeneities in the universe can be distinguished from homogeneous models using combined cosmological observations, highlighting the importance of multiple observables for accurate parameter determination.
Contribution
It demonstrates that combining three key cosmological observables can differentiate between inhomogeneous and homogeneous isotropic universe models under adiabatic perturbations.
Findings
Inhomogeneous and homogeneous models predict different data for all three observables when combined.
Two observables alone are insufficient to distinguish the models, but three can break the degeneracy.
Distinguishing the models depends on the assumption of adiabatic perturbations.
Abstract
Usually, we assume that there is no inhomogeneity isotropic in terms of our location in our uni- verse. This assumption has not been observationally confirmed yet in sufficient accuracy, and we need to consider the possibility that there are non-negligible large-scale isotropic inhomogeneities in our universe. The existence of large-scale isotropic inhomogeneities affects the determination of the cosmological parameters. In particular, from only the distance-redshift relation, we can not dis- tinguish the inhomogeneous isotropic universe model from the homogeneous isotropic one, because of the ambiguity in the cosmological parameters. In this paper, in order to avoid such ambiguity, we consider three observables, the distance-redshift relation, the fluctuation spectrum of the cosmic microwave background radiation(CMBR) and the scale of the baryon acoustic oscillation(BAO), and compare…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
