Models of the Chisholm set

TL;DR

This paper presents a counter-example demonstrating a conflict between a specific condition and other model conditions in Carmo and Jones' framework for contrary-to-duty obligations.

Contribution

It provides a counter-example that challenges the consistency of Carmo and Jones' model conditions, highlighting potential issues in their approach.

Findings

Counter-example shows conflict in model conditions

Highlights limitations in Carmo and Jones' framework

Suggests need for revised conditions or assumptions

Abstract

We give a counter-example showing that Carmo and Jones' condition 5(e) may conflict with other conditions on the models in their paper \emph{A new approach to contrary-to-duty obligations}.