A "Rule of Five" Framework for Models and Modeling to Unify Mathematicians and Biologists and Improve Student Learning
Carrie Diaz Eaton, Hannah C. Highlander, Kam D. Dahlquist, M. Drew, LaMar, Glenn Ledder, Richard C. Schugart

TL;DR
This paper proposes a unified 'Rule of Five' framework for models and modeling to bridge disciplinary gaps between mathematicians and biologists, enhancing interdisciplinary understanding and student learning.
Contribution
It extends the existing 'Rule of Four' to a comprehensive 'Rule of Five' framework that unifies diverse disciplinary definitions of modeling.
Findings
Framework unifies mathematical and biological modeling perspectives
Identifies gaps in current modeling practices across disciplines
Highlights benefits for student learning and interdisciplinary collaboration
Abstract
Despite widespread calls for the incorporation of mathematical modeling into the undergraduate biology curriculum, there is lack of a common understanding around the definition of modeling, which inhibits progress. In this paper, we extend the "Rule of Four," initially used in calculus reform efforts, to a framework for models and modeling that is inclusive of varying disciplinary definitions of each. This unifying framework allows us to both build on strengths that each discipline and its students bring, but also identify gaps in modeling activities practiced by each discipline. We also discuss benefits to student learning and interdisciplinary collaboration.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
