Demonstrating Diversity in Star Formation Histories with the CSI Survey
Alan Dressler (1), Daniel D. Kelson (1), Louis E. Abramson (2),, Michael D. Gladders (3), Augustus Oemler, Jr. (1), Bianca M. Poggianti (4),, John S. Mulchaey (1), Benedetta Vulcani (5), Stephen A. Shectman (1), Rik J., Williams (6)

TL;DR
This study uses spectro-photometric data from the CSI Survey to analyze star formation histories of over 22,000 galaxies, revealing diverse evolutionary paths that challenge simple models and suggest early-set SFHs with gradual declines.
Contribution
It provides the first large-scale, individual SFH measurements for thousands of galaxies, demonstrating the diversity of galaxy evolution and limitations of traditional models.
Findings
Wide diversity of SFHs across galaxy masses
No unique link between halo mass and SFH
Support for a 2-parameter lognormal SFH model
Abstract
We present coarse but robust star formation histories (SFHs) derived from spectro-photometric data of the Carnegie-Spitzer-IMACS Survey, for 22,494 galaxies at 0.3<z<0.9 with stellar masses of 10^9 Msun to 10^12 Msun. Our study moves beyond "average" SFHs and distribution functions of specific star formation rates (sSFRs) to individually measured SFHs for tens of thousands of galaxies. By comparing star formation rates (SFRs) with timescales of 10^10, 10^9, and 10^8 years, we find a wide diversity of SFHs: 'old galaxies' that formed most or all of their stars early; galaxies that formed stars with declining or constant SFRs over a Hubble time, and genuinely 'young galaxies' that formed most of their stars since z=1. This sequence is one of decreasing stellar mass, but, remarkably, each type is found over a mass range of a factor of 10. Conversely, galaxies at any given mass follow a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
