[OIII] emission line as a tracer of star-forming galaxies at high redshifts: Comparison between H$\alpha$ and [OIII] emitters at $z$=2.23 in HiZELS
T. L. Suzuki, T. Kodama, D. Sobral, A. A. Khostovan, M. Hayashi, R., Shimakawa, Y. Koyama, K.-i. Tadaki, I. Tanaka, Y. Minowa, M. Yamamoto, I., Smail, and P. N. Best

TL;DR
This study compares Hα and [OIII] emission line-selected galaxies at z=2.23, finding similar physical properties and highlighting [OIII] as a valuable tracer for high-redshift star-forming galaxies, especially beyond z>3.
Contribution
It demonstrates that [OIII] emission can effectively trace star-forming galaxies at high redshift, offering an alternative when Hα is unobservable from the ground.
Findings
Hα and [OIII] emitters have similar stellar mass, dust, and SFR distributions.
Sources with strong [OIII] emission show higher star formation activity.
[OIII] is a promising tracer for star-forming galaxies at z>3.
Abstract
We investigate the properties of =2.23 H and [OIII]5007 emitters using the narrow-band-selected samples obtained from the High- Emission Line Survey (HiZELS: Sobral et al. 2013). We construct two samples of the H and [OIII] emitters and compare their integrated physical properties. We find that the distribution of stellar masses, dust extinction, star formation rates (SFRs), and specific SFRs, is not statistically different between the two samples. When we separate the full galaxy sample into three subsamples according to the detections of the H and/or [OIII] emission lines, most of the sources detected with both H and [OIII] show -9.5. The comparison of the three subsamples suggests that sources with strong [OIII] line emission tend to have the highest star-forming activity out all galaxies that we study. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
