New quantum number for the many-electron Dirac-Coulomb Hamiltonian
Stanislav Komorovsky (1, 2), Michal Repisky (1), Luk\'a\v{s}, Bu\v{c}insk\'y (3) ((1) Centre for Theoretical, Computational Chemistry,, Department of Chemistry, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, (2) Institute, of Inorganic Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new quantum number based on the square of a many-electron time-reversal operator for the Dirac-Coulomb Hamiltonian, providing a relativistic analogue to spin symmetry and enabling new computational and theoretical tools.
Contribution
It defines a novel quantum number from the square of a many-electron time-reversal operator, creating a relativistic counterpart to spin symmetry and leading to the concept of Kramers CSF.
Findings
The operator $\\mathcal{K}_+^2$ commutes with the Dirac-Coulomb Hamiltonian.
Introduction of Kramers CSF as a relativistic configuration state function.
Potential applications in relativistic quantum chemistry and spectroscopy.
Abstract
By breaking the spin symmetry in the relativistic domain, a powerful tool in physical sciences was lost. In this work, we examine an alternative of spin symmetry for systems described by the many-electron Dirac-Coulomb Hamiltonian. We show that the square of many-electron operator , defined as a sum of individual single-electron time-reversal (TR) operators, is a linear Hermitian operator which commutes with the Dirac-Coulomb Hamiltonian in a finite Fock subspace. In contrast to the square of a standard unitary many-electron TR operator , the has a rich eigenspectrum having potential to substitute spin symmetry in the relativistic domain. We demonstrate that is connected to through an exponential mapping, in the same way as spin operators are mapped to the spin rotational group. Consequently, we call…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
