LAMOST observations in the Kepler field. Analysis of the stellar parameters measured with the LASP based on the low-resolution spectra
Anbing Ren, Jianning Fu, Peter De Cat, Yue Wu, Xiaohu Yang, Jianrong, Shi, Ali Luo, Haotong Zhang, Subo Dong, Ruyuan Zhang, Yong Zhang, Yonghui, Hou, Yuefei Wang, Zihuang Cao, Bing Du

TL;DR
This paper presents the analysis of stellar parameters from LAMOST low-resolution spectra in the Kepler field, including calibration, error estimation, and discovery of metal-poor and high-velocity star candidates, enhancing stellar characterization for Kepler data.
Contribution
The study provides calibrated stellar parameters for over 50,000 stars in the Kepler field using LAMOST spectra, with error analysis and identification of interesting stellar candidates.
Findings
Identification of 106 candidate metal-poor stars
Discovery of 9 candidate very metal-poor stars
Detection of 18 candidate high-velocity stars
Abstract
All of the 14 subfields of the Kepler field have been observed at least once with the Large Sky Area Multi-Object Fiber Spectroscopic Telescope (LAMOST, Xinglong Observatory, China) during the 2012-2014 observation seasons. There are 88,628 reduced spectra with SNR (signal-to-noise ratio in g band) 6 after the first round (2012-2014) of observations for the LAMOST-Kepler project (LK-project). By adopting the upgraded version of the LAMOST Stellar Parameter pipeline (LASP), we have determined the atmospheric parameters ( , , and ) and heliocentric radial velocity for 51,406 stars with 61,226 spectra. Compared with atmospheric parameters derived from both high-resolution spectroscopy and asteroseismology method for common stars in Huber et al. (2014), an external calibration of LASP atmospheric parameters was made, leading to the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
