Linear and non-linear bias: predictions vs. measurements
Kai Hoffmann, Julien Bel, Enrique Gaztanaga

TL;DR
This paper compares various methods of measuring galaxy bias parameters, revealing consistent relations and small variations, which can enhance cosmological model constraints using clustering statistics.
Contribution
It introduces direct bias measurement techniques and compares them with traditional correlation-based methods, highlighting their consistency and potential for improved cosmological constraints.
Findings
Bias measurements vary by about 5% across methods and halo masses.
A tight relation exists between linear and quadratic bias parameters.
Results are consistent across different cosmologies and redshifts.
Abstract
We study the linear and non-linear bias parameters which determine the mapping between the distributions of galaxies and the full matter density fields, comparing different measurements and predictions. Associating galaxies with dark matter haloes in the MICE Grand Challenge N-body simulation we directly measure the bias parameters by comparing the smoothed density fluctuations of haloes and matter in the same region at different positions as a function of smoothing scale. Alternatively we measure the bias parameters by matching the probability distributions of halo and matter density fluctuations, which can be applied to observations. These direct bias measurements are compared to corresponding measurements from two-point and different third-order correlations, as well as predictions from the peak-background model, which we presented in previous articles using the same data. We find an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
