Kinematic properties of double-barred galaxies: simulations vs. integral-field observations
Min Du, Victor P. Debattista, Juntai Shen, Michele Cappellari

TL;DR
This study compares high-resolution simulations of double-barred galaxies with integral-field observations, revealing distinct kinematic features like $\sigma$-humps and distorted velocity contours, and demonstrates the models' qualitative agreement with real galaxy data.
Contribution
The paper provides a detailed comparison of simulated and observed kinematic features of double-barred galaxies, highlighting the origin of $\sigma$-humps and other signatures.
Findings
Double-barred galaxies show distinctive kinematic features such as $\sigma$-humps and distorted isovelocity contours.
Simulations reproduce observed features like $\sigma$-humps and rings in real galaxies.
Inner bars exhibit streaming motions similar to large-scale bars, with unique $\sigma_z$ peaks.
Abstract
Using high resolution -body simulations, we recently reported that a dynamically cool inner disk embedded in a hotter outer disk can naturally generate a steady double-barred (S2B) structure. Here we study the kinematics of these S2B simulations, and compare them to integral-field observations from ATLAS and SAURON. We show that S2B galaxies exhibit several distinct kinematic features, namely: (1) significantly distorted isovelocity contours at the transition region between the two bars, (2) peaks in along the minor axis of inner bars, which we term "-humps", that are often accompanied by ring/spiral-like features of increased , (3) anti-correlations in the region of the inner bar for certain orientations, and (4) rings of positive when viewed at low inclinations. The most impressive of these features are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
