Sub-sampled Newton Methods with Non-uniform Sampling

TL;DR

This paper introduces randomized Newton-type algorithms with non-uniform sampling strategies to efficiently minimize convex functions, achieving faster convergence and lower computational complexity in high-dimensional settings.

Contribution

It proposes novel non-uniform sampling methods based on block norm squares and leverage scores for Newton methods, improving efficiency and robustness over existing approaches.

Findings

Achieves linear-quadratic convergence with O(d log d) samples per iteration.

Demonstrates at least twice the speed of traditional Newton's methods in experiments.

Provides theoretical guarantees on convergence and complexity improvements.

Abstract

We consider the problem of finding the minimizer of a convex function $F: \mathbb R^d \rightarrow \mathbb R$ of the form $F(w) := \sum_{i=1}^n f_i(w) + R(w)$ where a low-rank factorization of $\nabla^2 f_i(w)$ is readily available. We consider the regime where $n \gg d$. As second-order methods prove to be effective in finding the minimizer to a high-precision, in this work, we propose randomized Newton-type algorithms that exploit \textit{non-uniform} sub-sampling of $\{\nabla^2 f_i(w)\}_{i=1}^{n}$, as well as inexact updates, as means to reduce the computational complexity. Two non-uniform sampling distributions based on {\it block norm squares} and {\it block partial leverage scores} are considered in order to capture important terms among $\{\nabla^2 f_i(w)\}_{i=1}^{n}$. We show that at each iteration non-uniformly sampling at most $\mathcal O(d \log d)$ terms from $\{\nabla^2 f_i(w)\}_{i=1}^{n}$ is sufficient to achieve a linear-quadratic convergence rate in $w$ when a suitable initial point is provided. In addition, we show that our algorithms achieve a lower computational complexity and exhibit more robustness and better dependence on problem specific quantities, such as the condition number, compared to similar existing methods, especially the ones based on uniform sampling. Finally, we empirically demonstrate that our methods are at least twice as fast as Newton's methods with ridge logistic regression on several real datasets.