Antiferromagnetic correlations in two-dimensional fermionic Mott-insulating and metallic phases
J. H. Drewes, L. A. Miller, E. Cocchi, C. F. Chan, D. Pertot, F., Brennecke, M. K\"ohl

TL;DR
This study investigates how antiferromagnetic correlations develop in two-dimensional ultracold fermionic gases, revealing their dependence on temperature, doping, and interaction strength, and connecting these findings to models of quantum magnetism.
Contribution
It provides experimental measurements of antiferromagnetic correlations in 2D fermionic systems, demonstrating the transition from Hubbard to Heisenberg behavior and the effects of doping.
Findings
Antiferromagnetic correlations increase as temperature decreases near half-filling.
Doping suppresses magnetic correlations, indicating their sensitivity to carrier concentration.
Data aligns with the Heisenberg model at strong interactions and half-filling.
Abstract
Near zero temperature, quantum magnetism can non-trivially arise from short-range interactions, but the occurrence of magnetic order depends crucially on the interplay of interactions, lattice geometry, dimensionality and doping. Even though the consequences of this interplay are not yet fully understood, quantum magnetism is believed to be connected to a range of complex phenomena in the solid state, for example, in the context of high- superconductivity and spin liquids in frustrated lattices. Ultracold atomic Fermi gases in optical lattices constitute an experimental system with unrivalled tunability and detection capabilities to explore quantum magnetism by analog quantum simulation. In this work, we study the emergence of antiferromagnetic correlations between ultracold fermionic atoms in two dimensions with decreasing temperature. We determine the magnetic susceptibility of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
