Public Naming of Planets and Planetary Satellites
T. Montmerle, P. Benvenuti, Sze-leung Cheung, L.L. Christensen, A., Lecavelier des Etangs, Xiaowei Liu, D. Lubowich, E. Mamajek, R. Schulz, G., Valsecchi, G. Williams, and R. Williams

TL;DR
The paper discusses the IAU's tradition of public participation in naming celestial bodies, highlighting the new 'NameExoWorlds' contest to engage public interest in exoplanet naming while maintaining scientific and organizational authority.
Contribution
It introduces the 'NameExoWorlds' project as a formalized public engagement initiative for exoplanet naming, balancing public interest with scientific standards.
Findings
Established clear rules for public exoplanet naming campaigns
Secured IAU's authority in officially approving names
Boosted public interest in astronomy through the contest
Abstract
While one of the IAU's missions is to "serve as the internationally recognized authority for assigning designations to celestial bodies and surface features on them", the participation of the public in the naming of celestial objects has been a little-known, but decade-long tradition of the IAU. While reiterating its opposition to having the public pay to give a name to an exoplanet, the IAU Executive Committee nonetheless recognized the right of organizations to invite public, international exoplanet naming or voting campaigns. To this end, clear selection rules were to be defined by the IAU, inviting mutual collaboration, the goal being to sanction the campaign and officially approve the resulting names, for the sake of boosting the public's interest in astronomy and at the same time reaffirm the authority of the IAU. In no way were these names supposed to supersede the designations…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
