Robust Bell inequalities from communication complexity
Sophie Laplante, Mathieu Lauri\`ere, Alexandre Nolin, J\'er\'emie, Roland, Gabriel Senno

TL;DR
This paper explores the construction of robust Bell inequalities resistant to noise and detection loopholes, deriving large quantum violations from communication complexity gaps, with implications for quantum nonlocality tests.
Contribution
It introduces a method to derive large violations of Bell inequalities from communication complexity bounds, including inefficiency-resistant inequalities, enhancing robustness against noise and loopholes.
Findings
Large violations can be exponentially derived from communication complexity gaps.
Inefficiency-resistant Bell inequalities can be constructed with violations exponential in input size.
The approach improves robustness of Bell tests against noise and detection loopholes.
Abstract
The question of how large Bell inequality violations can be, for quantum distributions, has been the object of much work in the past several years. We say that a Bell inequality is normalized if its absolute value does not exceed 1 for any classical (i.e. local) distribution. Upper and (almost) tight lower bounds have been given for the quantum violation of these Bell inequalities in terms of number of outputs of the distribution, number of inputs, and the dimension of the shared quantum states. In this work, we revisit normalized Bell inequalities together with another family: inefficiency-resistant Bell inequalities. To be inefficiency-resistant, the Bell value must not exceed 1 for any local distribution, including those that can abort. This makes the Bell inequality resistant to the detection loophole, while a normalized Bell inequality is resistant to general local noise. Both…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
