Insights from Synthetic Star-forming Regions: III. Calibration of Measurement Techniques of Star-formation Rates
Christine M. Koepferl, Thomas P. Robitaille, and James E. Dale

TL;DR
This paper evaluates and improves methods for measuring star-formation rates in star-forming regions using synthetic observations, highlighting the limitations of existing infrared tracers at local scales and proposing new calibration strategies.
Contribution
It systematically assesses the accuracy of common SFR measurement techniques and introduces improved calibration methods tailored for individual star-forming regions.
Findings
Infrared SFR tracers calibrated for galaxies are unreliable at local scales.
Adjusting characteristic timescales improves calibration accuracy.
High-mass stellar feedback causes rapid infrared emission decline.
Abstract
Through an extensive set of realistic synthetic observations (produced in Paper I), we assess in this part of the paper series (Paper III) how the choice of observational techniques affects the measurement of star-formation rates (SFRs) in star-forming regions. We test the accuracy of commonly used techniques and construct new methods to extract the SFR, so that these findings can be applied to measure the SFR in real regions throughout the Milky Way. We investigate diffuse infrared SFR tracers such as those using 24 {\mu}m, 70 {\mu}m and total infrared emission, which have been previously calibrated for global galaxy scales. We set up a toy model of a galaxy and show that the infrared emission is consistent with the intrinsic SFR using extra-galactic calibrated laws (although the consistency does not prove their reliability). For local scales, we show that these techniques produce…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
