Comment on "Scientific Regress" (First Things May 2016)
J. I. Katz
TL;DR
This paper discusses the limitations and fallibility of science, responding to William A. Wilson's views on scientific regress and the boundaries of scientific knowledge.
Contribution
It provides a critical commentary on Wilson's arguments, highlighting the importance of recognizing science's limits while defending its overall reliability.
Findings
Science has inherent limitations and fallibility.
Acknowledging limits does not undermine scientific progress.
Critical reflection enhances scientific understanding.
Abstract
Response to William A. Wilson on the limits and fallibility of science.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMeta-analysis and systematic reviews · Health and Medical Research Impacts