The systematic error test for PSF correction in weak gravitational lensing shear measurement by The ERA Method by Idealizing PSF
Yuki Okura, Toshifumi Futamase

TL;DR
This paper introduces an improved ERA method for PSF correction in weak lensing shear measurement, enabling accurate correction with minimal assumptions and demonstrating less than 0.1% systematic error in tests and real data.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel ERA method that corrects PSF effects in weak lensing without approximations, handling realistic galaxy and PSF shapes.
Findings
Systematic error less than 0.1% in numerical tests
Effective correction of complex PSF and galaxy shapes
Fast processing time per object (under 1 second)
Abstract
We improve the ERA(Ellipticity of Re-smeared Artificial image) method of PSF(Point Spread Function) correction in weak lensing shear analysis in order to treat realistic shape of galaxies and PSF. This is done by re-smearing PSF and the observed galaxy image smeared by a RSF(Re-Smearing Function), and allows us to use a new PSF with a simple shape and to correct PSF effect without any approximations and assumptions. We perform numerical test to show that the method applied for galaxies and PSF with some complicated shapes can correct PSF effect with systematic error less than 0.1%. We also apply ERA method for real data of Abell 1689 cluster to confirm that it is able to detect the systematic weak lensing shear pattern. The ERA method requires less than 0.1 or 1 second to correct PSF for each object in numerical test and real data analysis, respectively.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
