Response to "Comment on Static correlations functions and domain walls in glass-forming liquids: The case of a sandwich geometry" [J. Chem. Phys. 144, 227101 (2016)]
Giacomo Gradenigo, Roberto Trozzo, Andrea Cavagna, Tomas S. Grigera

TL;DR
This paper responds to critiques regarding the interpretation of point-to-set correlation functions in glass-forming liquids, clarifying which features are specific to glassy systems versus general confinement effects.
Contribution
It clarifies the distinctions between glass-specific behaviors and general confinement effects in the analysis of point-to-set correlations.
Findings
Distinguishes glass-specific features from general confinement effects
Addresses concerns raised in the previous comment
Clarifies the interpretation of correlation functions in disordered systems
Abstract
The point-to-set correlation function has proved to be a very valuable tool to probe structural correlations in disordered systems, but more than that, its detailed behavior has been used to try to draw information on the mechanisms leading to glassy behavior in supercooled liquids. For this reason it is of primary importance to discern which of those details are peculiar to glassy systems, and which are general features of confinement. Within the present response we provide an answer to the concerns raised in [J. Chem. Phys. 144, 227101 (2016)].
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
