Planck intermediate results. L. Evidence for spatial variation of the polarized thermal dust spectral energy distribution and implications for CMB $B$-mode analysis
Planck Collaboration: N. Aghanim, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C., Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, S., Basak, K. Benabed, J.-P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, A. Bonaldi, L., Bonavera, J. R. Bond, J. Borrill, F. R. Bouchet, F. Boulanger

TL;DR
This study uses Planck data to reveal spatial variations in polarized thermal dust emission, which impact the analysis of primordial B-modes and suggest the need for refined foreground modeling in CMB studies.
Contribution
It provides the first evidence of spatial variability in the polarized dust spectral energy distribution at high Galactic latitudes using Planck data.
Findings
Detected significant decorrelation of dust polarization between 217 and 353 GHz.
Found decorrelation increases with decreasing mean column density.
Proposed a power-law model for the spatial variation of dust SED.
Abstract
The characterization of the Galactic foregrounds has been shown to be the main obstacle in the challenging quest to detect primordial B-modes in the polarized microwave sky. We make use of the Planck-HFI 2015 data release at high frequencies to place new constraints on the properties of the polarized thermal dust emission at high Galactic latitudes. Here, we specifically study the spatial variability of the dust polarized spectral energy distribution, and its potential impact on the determination of the tensor-to-scalar ratio. We use the correlation ratio of the angular power spectra between the 217- and 353-GHz channels as a tracer of these potential variations, computed on different high Galactic latitude regions, ranging from 80% to 20% of the sky. The new insight from Planck data is a departure of the correlation ratio from unity that cannot be attributed to a spurious…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
