Assessing the interactivity and prescriptiveness of faculty professional development workshops: The Real-Time Professional Development Observation Tool (R-PDOT)
Alice Olmstead, Chandra Turpen

TL;DR
The paper introduces the R-PDOT, an observation tool designed to evaluate faculty engagement in professional development workshops, aiming to improve understanding and effectiveness of such workshops in STEM education.
Contribution
It develops and demonstrates the R-PDOT, a new evidence-based observational instrument for assessing workshop interactivity and prescriptiveness in faculty development.
Findings
R-PDOT effectively captures workshop engagement dynamics
Workshop sessions vary significantly in interactivity levels
Preliminary data suggest R-PDOT can inform workshop improvement
Abstract
Professional development workshops are one of the primary mechanisms used to help faculty improve their teaching, and draw in many STEM instructors every year. Although workshops serve a critical role in changing instructional practices within our community, we rarely assess workshops through careful consideration of how they engage faculty. Initial evidence suggests that workshop leaders often overlook central tenets of education research that are well-established in classroom contexts, such as the role of interactivity in enabling student learning. As such, there is a need to develop more robust, evidence-based models of how best to support faculty learning in professional development contexts, and to activity support workshop leaders in relating their design decisions to familiar ideas form other educational contexts. In response to these needs, we have developed an observation tool,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
