Predicting fuel research octane number using Fourier-transform infrared absorption spectra of neat hydrocarbons
Shane R. Daly, Kyle E. Niemeyer, William J. Cannella, and Christopher, L. Hagen

TL;DR
This study develops a spectroscopic-based statistical model to accurately predict the Research Octane Number of gasoline fuels, reducing reliance on costly traditional testing by focusing on key functional groups in IR spectra.
Contribution
The paper introduces a principal component regression model trained on neat and surrogate hydrocarbons that effectively predicts RON for complex gasoline blends, emphasizing the importance of functional group representation.
Findings
Model predicts RON within 34.8+/-36.1 on average for test fuels.
Adding specific minor components improves prediction accuracy.
Representation of functional groups is more critical than specific fuel composition.
Abstract
Liquid transportation fuels require costly and time-consuming tests to characterize metrics, such as Research Octane Number (RON) for gasoline. If fuel sale restrictions requiring use of standard Cooperative Fuel Research testing procedures do not apply, these tests may be avoided by using multivariate statistical models to predict RON and other quantities. Here we show that an accurate statistical model for the RON of gasoline and gasoline-like fuels can be constructed by ensuring the representation of key functional groups in the spectroscopic data set are used to train the model. We found that a principal component regression model for RON based on IR absorbance and informed using neat and 134 mixtures of n-heptane, isooctane, toluene, ethanol, methylcyclohexane, and 1-hexene could predict RON for the 10 Coordinating Research Council Fuels for Advanced Combustion Engine (FACE)…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
