Large-scale retrospective relative spectro-photometric self-calibration in space
Katarina Markovic, Will J. Percival, Marco Scodeggio, Anne, Ealet, Stefanie Wachter, Bianca Garilli, Luigi Guzzo, Roberto, Scaramella, Elisabetta Maiorano, Jerome Amiaux

TL;DR
This paper presents a new large-scale self-calibration method for slit-less spectroscopic galaxy surveys, demonstrating its effectiveness through simulations for the Euclid mission and emphasizing the importance of survey overlap and dithering patterns.
Contribution
It introduces a joint fitting calibration approach that separates detector and exposure calibration, tailored for large-scale slit-less spectroscopic surveys like Euclid.
Findings
Calibration accuracy depends on dithering pattern and survey overlap.
Proposed 'S'-pattern dithering improves calibration connectivity.
Simulation results show effective flux error correction with the method.
Abstract
We consider the application of relative self-calibration using overlap regions to spectroscopic galaxy surveys that use slit-less spectroscopy. This method is based on that developed for the SDSS by Padmanabhan at al. (2008) in that we consider jointly fitting and marginalising over calibrator brightness, rather than treating these as free parameters. However, we separate the calibration of the detector-to-detector from the full-focal-plane exposure-to-exposure calibration. To demonstrate how the calibration procedure will work, we simulate the procedure for a potential implementation of the spectroscopic component of the wide Euclid survey. We study the change of coverage and the determination of relative multiplicative errors in flux measurements for different dithering configurations. We use the new method to study the case where the flat-field across each exposure or detector is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
