Breaking Be: a sterile neutrino solution to the cosmological lithium problem
Laura Salvati, Luca Pagano, Massimiliano Lattanzi, Martina Gerbino,, Alessandro Melchiorri

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether a sterile neutrino decay after Big Bang nucleosynthesis can resolve the cosmological lithium problem, fitting current observational data and predicting measurable effects on the early universe.
Contribution
It constrains sterile neutrino parameters that can solve the lithium problem, linking particle physics with cosmological observations and proposing testable predictions for future experiments.
Findings
Sterile neutrino with ~4.35 MeV mass can explain lithium abundance discrepancy.
Decay parameters are constrained by current CMB, spectral distortion, and primordial abundance data.
Future missions like COrE+ and PIXIE can further refine sterile neutrino properties.
Abstract
The possibility that the so-called "lithium problem", i.e. the disagreement between the theoretical abundance predicted for primordial Li assuming standard nucleosynthesis and the value inferred from astrophysical measurements, can be solved through a non-thermal BBN mechanism has been investigated by several authors. In particular, it has been shown that the decay of a MeV-mass particle, like, e.g., a sterile neutrino, decaying after BBN not only solves the lithium problem, but also satisfies cosmological and laboratory bounds, making such a scenario worth to be investigated in further detail. In this paper, we constrain the parameters of the model with the combination of current data, including Planck 2015 measurements of temperature and polarization anisotropies of the CMB, FIRAS limits on spectral distortions, astrophysical measurements of primordial abundances and laboratory…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
