Divergent discourse between protests and counter-protests: #BlackLivesMatter and #AllLivesMatter
Ryan J. Gallagher, Andrew J. Reagan, Christopher M. Danforth, Peter, Sheridan Dodds

TL;DR
This study analyzes how #BlackLivesMatter and #AllLivesMatter Twitter discussions diverge and interact, revealing opposition patterns, hijacking behaviors, and the movement's resilience in maintaining focus amid counter-protests.
Contribution
It provides a multi-level analysis of over 860,000 tweets to quantify discourse divergence and hijacking dynamics between protest and counter-protest hashtags.
Findings
#AllLivesMatter facilitates opposition to #BlackLivesMatter.
Hijacking of #AllLivesMatter by #BlackLivesMatter advocates is significant.
Black Lives Matter maintains focus by framing counter-protest discussions as central.
Abstract
Since the shooting of Black teenager Michael Brown by White police officer Darren Wilson in Ferguson, Missouri, the protest hashtag #BlackLivesMatter has amplified critiques of extrajudicial killings of Black Americans. In response to #BlackLivesMatter, other Twitter users have adopted #AllLivesMatter, a counter-protest hashtag whose content argues that equal attention should be given to all lives regardless of race. Through a multi-level analysis of over 860,000 tweets, we study how these protests and counter-protests diverge by quantifying aspects of their discourse. We find that #AllLivesMatter facilitates opposition between #BlackLivesMatter and hashtags such as #PoliceLivesMatter and #BlueLivesMatter in such a way that historically echoes the tension between Black protesters and law enforcement. In addition, we show that a significant portion of #AllLivesMatter use stems from…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
