Laplace-transformed atomic orbital-based M{\o}ller-Plesset perturbation theory for relativistic two-component Hamiltonians
Benjamin Helmich-Paris, Michal Repisky, and Lucas Visscher

TL;DR
This paper introduces a Laplace-transformed atomic orbital-based MP2 method for relativistic two-component Hamiltonians, enabling efficient large-scale correlated relativistic calculations with minimal changes from non-relativistic equations.
Contribution
It develops a low-order scaling relativistic MP2 approach using quaternion algebra, extending non-relativistic MP2 techniques to relativistic Hamiltonians with similar computational structure.
Findings
Relativistic MP2 equations differ from non-relativistic ones mainly by quaternion algebra.
Spin-free and spin-orbit MP2 energies are nearly identical for light elements.
Long-range decay of Coulomb and exchange energies is similar to non-relativistic MP2.
Abstract
We present a formulation of Laplace-transformed atomic orbital-based second-order M{\o}ller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2) energies for two-component Hamiltonians in the Kramers-restricted formalism. This low-order scaling technique can be used to enable correlated relativistic calculations for large molecular systems. We show that the working equations to compute the relativistic MP2 energy differ by merely a change of algebra (quaternion instead of real) from their non-relativistic counterparts. With a proof-of-principle implementation we study the effect of the nuclear charge on the magnitude of half-transformed integrals and show that for light elements spin-free and spin-orbit MP2 energies are almost identical. Furthermore, we investigate the effect of separation of charge distributions on the Coulomb and exchange energy con- tributions, which show the same long-range decay with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
