GAMA/H-ATLAS: A meta-analysis of SFR indicators - comprehensive measures of the SFR-M* relation and Cosmic Star Formation History at z < 0.4
L. J. M. Davies, S. P. Driver, A. S. G. Robotham, M. W. Grootes, C. C., Popescu, R. J. Tuffs, A. Hopkins, M. Alpaslan, S. K. Andrews, J., Bland-Hawthorn, M. N. Bremer, S. Brough, M. J. I. Brown, M. E. Cluver, S., Croom, E. da Cunha, L. Dunne, M. A. Lara-Lopez, J. Liske

TL;DR
This paper conducts a comprehensive meta-analysis of star-formation rate indicators in the GAMA survey, recalibrates them for consistency, and explores the evolution of star formation in the local universe over the past 3 billion years.
Contribution
It introduces new, robust luminosity-to-SFR calibrations based on radiation transfer methods and applies them to analyze the SFR-M* relation and cosmic star formation history at z < 0.4.
Findings
Different SFR indicators yield inconsistent SFR-M* relations.
Recalibrated SFR indicators show more consistent relations.
The cosmic star formation rate density at z < 0.35 is characterized.
Abstract
We present a meta-analysis of star-formation rate (SFR) indicators in the GAMA survey, producing 12 different SFR metrics and determining the SFR-M* relation for each. We compare and contrast published methods to extract the SFR from each indicator, using a well-defined local sample of morphologically-selected spiral galaxies, which excludes sources which potentially have large recent changes to their SFR. The different methods are found to yield SFR-M* relations with inconsistent slopes and normalisations, suggesting differences between calibration methods. The recovered SFR-M* relations also have a large range in scatter which, as SFRs of the targets may be considered constant over the different timescales, suggests differences in the accuracy by which methods correct for attenuation in individual targets. We then recalibrate all SFR indicators to provide new, robust and consistent…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
