Exact special twist method for quantum Monte Carlo simulations
M. Dagrada, S. Karakuzu, V. L. Vildosola, M. Casula, S. Sorella

TL;DR
The paper introduces the exact special twist (EST) method for quantum Monte Carlo simulations, which accurately reduces finite-size effects with lower computational cost by using a single wavefunction, improving efficiency in large periodic systems.
Contribution
The authors develop and validate the EST method, providing a systematic way to find the optimal twist that reproduces the infinite-size mean-field energy within an arbitrarily small error, outperforming traditional twist averaging.
Findings
EST effectively reduces finite-size errors in quantum Monte Carlo simulations.
EST achieves similar accuracy to twist averaging but with significantly lower computational cost.
EST performs well in calculating correlation functions like ionic forces and pair distribution functions.
Abstract
We present a systematic investigation of the special twist method introduced by Rajagopal [ Phys. Rev. B 51, 10591 (1995) ] for reducing finite-size effects in correlated calculations of periodic extended systems with Coulomb interactions and Fermi statistics. We propose a procedure for finding special twist values which, at variance with previous applications of this method, reproduce the energy of the mean-field infinite-size limit solution within an adjustable (arbitrarily small) numerical error. This choice of the special twist is shown to be the most accurate single-twist solution for curing one-body finite-size effects in correlated calculations. For these reasons we dubbed our procedure "exact special twist" (EST). EST only needs a fully converged independent-particles or mean-field calculation within the primitive cell and a simple fit to find the special twist…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
