The Gamma question for many-one degrees
Matthew Harrison-Trainor

TL;DR
This paper investigates the possible values of the gamma function for many-one degrees, showing it can take any value in [0,1/2] or be 1, contrasting with Turing degrees where only 0, 1/2, and 1 are possible.
Contribution
It establishes the range of the gamma function for many-one degrees as [0,1/2] union {1}, expanding understanding of coarse computability in degree theory.
Findings
Range of Gamma_m is [0,1/2] ∪ {1}
Gamma_T only takes values 0, 1/2, 1
Gamma_m can attain any value in [0,1/2]
Abstract
A set is coarsely computable with density if there is an algorithm for deciding membership in which always gives a (possibly incorrect) answer, and which gives a correct answer with density at least . To any Turing degree we can assign a value : the minimum, over all sets in , of the highest density at which is coarsely computable. The closer is to , the closer is to being computable. Andrews, Cai, Diamondstone, Jockush, and Lempp noted that can take on the values , , and , but not any values in strictly between and . They asked whether the value of can be strictly between and . This is the Gamma question. Replacing Turing degrees by many-one degrees, we get an analogous question, and the same arguments show that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
