
TL;DR
This paper establishes a clear dichotomy in the behavior of the total variation distance between sums of i.i.d. variables and the normal distribution, showing it is either always maximal or decays at a specific rate.
Contribution
It proves a dichotomy result for the total variation distance in the CLT, identifying two distinct regimes of convergence behavior.
Findings
If the total variation distance is not always 1, it decreases at a rate of n^{-1/2}.
The total variation distance is either constantly 1 or converges to zero at a specific rate.
The result applies to i.i.d. variables with finite third moments.
Abstract
Let , , be a sequence of independent and identically distributed random variables with finite third moment, and let be the total variation distance between the distribution of and the normal distribution with the same mean and variance. In this note, we show the dichotomy that either for all or .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
