Relativistic Interpretation of Newtonian Simulations for Cosmic Structure Formation
Christian Fidler, Thomas Tram, Cornelius Rampf, Robert Crittenden,, Kazuya Koyama, David Wands

TL;DR
This paper develops a relativistic framework that allows Newtonian N-body simulations to be accurately interpreted within General Relativity, accounting for radiation effects and ensuring consistency with relativistic perturbation theory.
Contribution
It introduces Newtonian motion gauges and a method to incorporate relativistic corrections into Newtonian simulations without modifying their trajectories.
Findings
Radiation causes >1% corrections to matter density on large scales if initialised before z=50.
Relativistic space-time can be constructed where Newtonian trajectories are consistent with GR.
The framework enables interpretation of Newtonian simulations within a relativistic context using existing Einstein--Boltzmann codes.
Abstract
The standard numerical tools for studying non-linear collapse of matter are Newtonian -body simulations. Previous work has shown that these simulations are in accordance with General Relativity (GR) up to first order in perturbation theory, provided that the effects from radiation can be neglected. In this paper we show that the present day matter density receives more than 1 corrections from radiation on large scales if Newtonian simulations are initialised before . We provide a relativistic framework in which \emph{unmodified} Newtonian simulations are compatible with linear GR even in the presence of radiation. Our idea is to use GR perturbation theory to keep track of the evolution of relativistic species and the relativistic space-time consistent with the Newtonian trajectories computed in -body simulations. If metric potentials are sufficiently small, they can be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
