Finite-density phase diagram of a (1+1)-d non-abelian lattice gauge theory with tensor networks
Pietro Silvi, Enrique Rico, Marcello Dalmonte, Ferdinand Tschirsich, and Simone Montangero

TL;DR
This paper uses tensor network methods to map out the finite-density phase diagram of a (1+1)-dimensional non-abelian SU(2) lattice gauge theory, revealing various phases and phase transitions influenced by matter density and coupling strength.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed numerical characterization of the phase diagram of a non-abelian lattice gauge theory at finite density using tensor networks, including analytical confirmation of some phases.
Findings
Identification of a meson BCS liquid phase at weak coupling
Observation of a charge density wave of mesons at strong coupling and unit filling
Discovery of two tri-critical points consistent with an SU(2)_2 Wess-Zumino-Novikov-Witten model
Abstract
We investigate the finite-density phase diagram of a non-abelian SU(2) lattice gauge theory in (1+1)-dimensions using tensor network methods. We numerically characterise the phase diagram as a function of the matter filling and of the matter-field coupling, identifying different phases, some of them appearing only at finite densities. For weak matter-field coupling we find a meson BCS liquid phase, which is confirmed by second-order analytical perturbation theory. At unit filling and for strong coupling, the system undergoes a phase transition to a charge density wave of single-site (spin-0) mesons via spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking. At finite densities, the chiral symmetry is restored almost everywhere, and the meson BCS liquid becomes a simple liquid at strong couplings, with the exception of filling two-thirds, where a charge density wave of mesons spreading over neighbouring…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
