Abducing Compliance of Incomplete Event Logs
Federico Chesani, Riccardo De Masellis, Chiara Di Francescomarino, Chiara Ghidini, Paola Mello, Marco Montali, Sergio Tessaris

TL;DR
This paper introduces an abductive framework to assess process compliance in incomplete event logs, enhancing flexibility and effectiveness compared to traditional methods that require complete traces.
Contribution
It proposes a novel abductive approach for handling incomplete logs and refines compliance notions into strong and conditional compliance.
Findings
Framework effectively manages different types of incompleteness.
Experimental results demonstrate computational feasibility.
Refined compliance notions improve assessment accuracy.
Abstract
The capability to store data about business processes execution in so-called Event Logs has brought to the diffusion of tools for the analysis of process executions and for the assessment of the goodness of a process model. Nonetheless, these tools are often very rigid in dealing with with Event Logs that include incomplete information about the process execution. Thus, while the ability of handling incomplete event data is one of the challenges mentioned in the process mining manifesto, the evaluation of compliance of an execution trace still requires an end-to-end complete trace to be performed. This paper exploits the power of abduction to provide a flexible, yet computationally effective, framework to deal with different forms of incompleteness in an Event Log. Moreover it proposes a refinement of the classical notion of compliance into strong and conditional compliance to take…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
