Complex systems: features, similarity and connectivity

TL;DR

This paper proposes a systematic framework to unify diverse concepts and methods in complex networks research by categorizing them into features, similarity, and connectivity, facilitating cross-disciplinary integration.

Contribution

It introduces a structured approach to integrate multidisciplinary concepts in complex networks by classifying them into three main groups and analyzing their interrelations.

Findings

Identification of three main concept groups: features, similarity, connectivity.

Nine types of mappings between these groups for analysis and modeling.

Enhanced understanding of complex network analysis through systematic categorization.

Abstract

The increasing interest in complex networks research has been a consequence of several intrinsic features of this area, such as the generality of the approach to represent and model virtually any discrete system, and the incorporation of concepts and methods deriving from many areas, from statistical physics to sociology, which are often used in an independent way. Yet, for this same reason, it would be desirable to integrate these various aspects into a more coherent and organic framework, which would imply in several benefits normally allowed by the systematization in science, including the identification of new types of problems and the cross-fertilization between fields. More specifically, the identification of the main areas to which the concepts frequently used in complex networks can be applied paves the way to adopting and applying a larger set of concepts and methods deriving from those respective areas. Among the several areas that have been used in complex networks research, pattern recognition, optimization, linear algebra, and time series analysis seem to play a more basic and recurrent role. In the present manuscript, we propose a systematic way to integrate the concepts from these diverse areas regarding complex networks research. In order to do so, we start by grouping the multidisciplinary concepts into three main groups, namely features, similarity, and network connectivity. Then we show that several of the analysis and modeling approaches to complex networks can be thought as a composition of maps between these three groups, with emphasis on nine main types of mappings, which are presented and illustrated. Such a systematization of principles and approaches also provides an opportunity to review some of the most closely related works in the literature, which is also developed in this article.