KiDS-450: Cosmological parameter constraints from tomographic weak gravitational lensing
H. Hildebrandt, M. Viola, C. Heymans, S. Joudaki, K. Kuijken, C., Blake, T. Erben, B. Joachimi, D. Klaes, L. Miller, C.B. Morrison, R., Nakajima, G. Verdoes Kleijn, A. Amon, A. Choi, G. Covone, J.T.A. de Jong, A., Dvornik, I. Fenech Conti, A. Grado, J. Harnois-D\'eraps

TL;DR
This paper presents cosmological constraints from a tomographic weak lensing analysis of 450 square degrees from the KiDS survey, finding results consistent with other low-redshift probes but in tension with Planck 2015 CMB results.
Contribution
It introduces an improved shear measurement method, a robust redshift calibration, and a comprehensive analysis accounting for systematic uncertainties in weak lensing cosmology.
Findings
Measured $S_8=0.745\u00b10.039$, consistent with other low-redshift probes.
Found a 2.3-sigma tension with Planck 2015 results.
Provided high-quality data products for the community.
Abstract
We present cosmological parameter constraints from a tomographic weak gravitational lensing analysis of ~450deg of imaging data from the Kilo Degree Survey (KiDS). For a flat CDM cosmology with a prior on that encompasses the most recent direct measurements, we find . This result is in good agreement with other low redshift probes of large scale structure, including recent cosmic shear results, along with pre-Planck cosmic microwave background constraints. A - tension in and `substantial discordance' in the full parameter space is found with respect to the Planck 2015 results. We use shear measurements for nearly 15 million galaxies, determined with a new improved `self-calibrating' version of fit validated using an extensive suite of image simulations. Four-band photometric…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
