The Field White Dwarf Mass Distribution

TL;DR

This study analyzes the mass distribution of field white dwarfs using Gaia data, comparing observations with simulations to understand stellar evolution, but faces challenges in constraining model parameters and overpredicts massive white dwarfs.

Contribution

It provides a detailed comparison of observed and simulated white dwarf mass distributions, highlighting the effects of various astrophysical factors and biases.

Findings

Predicted mean masses align qualitatively with observations.

Overprediction of 40-50% for massive white dwarfs.

No evidence found for a population of double white dwarf mergers.

Abstract

We revisit the properties and astrophysical implications of the field white dwarf mass distribution in preparation of Gaia applications. Our study is based on the two samples with the best established completeness and most precise atmospheric parameters, the volume-complete survey within 20 pc and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) magnitude-limited sample. We explore the modelling of the observed mass distributions with Monte Carlo simulations, but find that it is difficult to constrain independently the initial mass function (IMF), the initial-to-final-mass relation (IFMR), the stellar formation history (SFH), the variation of the Galactic disk vertical scale height as a function of stellar age, and binary evolution. Each of these input ingredients has a moderate effect on the predicted mass distributions, and we must also take into account biases owing to unidentified faint objects (20 pc sample), as well as unknown masses for magnetic white dwarfs and spectroscopic calibration issues (SDSS sample). Nevertheless, we find that fixed standard assumptions for the above parameters result in predicted mean masses that are in good qualitative agreement with the observed values. It suggests that derived masses for both studied samples are consistent with our current knowledge of stellar and Galactic evolution. Our simulations overpredict by 40-50% the number of massive white dwarfs (M > 0.75 Msun) for both surveys, although we can not exclude a Salpeter IMF when we account for all biases. Furthermore, we find no evidence of a population of double white dwarf mergers in the observed mass distributions.