The Effect of Heteroscedasticity on Regression Trees
Will Ruth, Thomas Loughin

TL;DR
This paper investigates how heteroscedasticity affects the performance of regression trees, revealing that variance changes can impair split placement and prediction accuracy, especially impacting the pruning process.
Contribution
It provides the first assessment of regression tree behavior under heteroscedasticity, highlighting the influence of variance changes on split locations and pruning.
Findings
Heteroscedasticity adversely affects split placement in regression trees.
Variance changes impact the pruning algorithm's effectiveness.
The effects on splitting are significant in some applications.
Abstract
Regression trees are becoming increasingly popular as omnibus predicting tools and as the basis of numerous modern statistical learning ensembles. Part of their popularity is their ability to create a regression prediction without ever specifying a structure for the mean model. However, the method implicitly assumes homogeneous variance across the entire explanatory-variable space. It is unknown how the algorithm behaves when faced with heteroscedastic data. In this study, we assess the performance of the most popular regression-tree algorithm in a single-variable setting under a very simple step-function model for heteroscedasticity. We use simulation to show that the locations of splits, and hence the ability to accurately predict means, are both adversely influenced by the change in variance. We identify the pruning algorithm as the main concern, although the effects on the splitting…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeural Networks and Applications · Statistical Methods and Inference · Data Analysis with R
