Magnetic Properties from the Viewpoints of Electronic Hamiltonian: Spin Exchange Parameters, Spin Orientation and Spin-Half Misconception

TL;DR

This paper reviews how electronic Hamiltonian approaches can accurately describe magnetic properties, emphasizing the importance of orbital degrees of freedom and spin-orbit coupling, and clarifying misconceptions about spin-half ions.

Contribution

It demonstrates the consistency between spin and electronic Hamiltonian approaches and clarifies the limitations of spin Hamiltonians in predicting magnetic anisotropy.

Findings

Spin exchange parameters can be derived from DFT energy mapping.

Magnetic anisotropy requires orbital and SOC considerations, not just spin Hamiltonians.

5d ion oxides are better described by LS-coupling than jj-coupling schemes.

Abstract

In this chapter we review the quantitative and qualitative aspects of describing the properties of magnetic solids on the basis of electronic Hamiltonian. We show that a spin Hamiltonian approach becomes consistent with an electronic Hamiltonian approach if the spin lattice and its associated spin exchange parameters, to be used for the spin Hamiltonian, are determined by the energy-mapping analysis based on DFT calculations. The preferred spin orientation (i.e., the magnetic anisotropy) of a magnetic ion is not predicted by a spin Hamiltonian because it does not include the orbital degree of freedom explicitly. In contrast, the magnetic anisotropy is readily predicted by electronic structure theories employing both orbital and spin degrees of freedom, if one takes into consideration the spin-orbit coupling (SOC). It was shown that the preferred spin orientation of a magnetic ion can be predicted and understood in terms of the HOMO-LUMO interactions of the magnetic ion by taking SOC as perturbation. A spin Hamiltonian gives rise to the spin-half misconception, namely, the blind belief that spin-half magnetic ions do not possess magnetic anisotropy that arise from SOC. This misconception is a direct consequence from the limitedness of a spin Hamiltonian that it lacks the orbital degree of freedom. We show that the magnetic properties of 5d ion oxides are better explained by the LS-coupling than by the jj-coupling scheme of SOC, that the spin-orbital entanglement of 5d ions is not as strong as has been assumed.