Origin and evolution of two-component debris discs and an application to the q$^1$ Eridani system
Christian Sch\"uppler, Alexander V. Krivov, Torsten L\"ohne, Mark, Booth, Florian Kirchschlager, Sebastian Wolf

TL;DR
This paper investigates the origin of two-component debris discs, proposing a scenario where giant planets carve gaps in planetesimal discs, leading to stable inner and outer belts, and applies this model to the q$^1$ Eridani system.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed collisional evolution model for two-component debris discs formed by planetary carving, aligning with observational data of q$^1$ Eridani.
Findings
Inner disc can retain more material at older ages than previously thought.
The scenario matches thermal emission and scattered light observations of q$^1$ Eridani.
Supports a Solar System-like architecture with outer Kuiper belt, inner asteroid belt, and intermediate planets.
Abstract
Many debris discs reveal a two-component structure, with an outer Kuiper-belt analogue and a warm inner component whose origin is still a matter of debate. One possibility is that warm emission stems from an "asteroid belt" closer in to the star. We consider a scenario in which a set of giant planets is formed in an initially extended planetesimal disc. These planets carve a broad gap around their orbits, splitting up the disc into the outer and the inner belts. After the gas dispersal, both belts undergo collisional evolution in a steady-state regime. This scenario is explored with detailed collisional simulations involving realistic physics to describe a long-term collisional depletion of the two-component disc. We find that the inner disc may be able to retain larger amounts of material at older ages than thought before on the basis of simplified analytic models. We show that the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
