Characterizing Relative Frame Definability in Team Semantics via the Universal Modality
Katsuhiko Sano, Jonni Virtema

TL;DR
This paper characterizes when classes of finite transitive frames are definable in a modal logic with a universal modality, and explores modal definability in team-based logics, providing new Goldblatt-Thomason style theorems.
Contribution
It provides a characterization of definability in ML(U^+) relative to finite transitive frames and extends modal definability results to team-based logics.
Findings
F-classes definable in ML(U^+) are closed under subframes and bounded morphic images.
A trichotomy for global model definability in team-based logics.
A dichotomy for frame definability in team-based logics.
Abstract
Let ML(U^+) denote the fragment of modal logic extended with the universal modality in which the universal modality occurs only positively. We characterize the relative definability of ML(U^+) relative to finite transitive frames in the spirit of the well-known Goldblatt-Thomason theorem. We show that a class F of Kripke frames is definable in ML(U^+) relative to finite transitive frames if and only if F is closed under taking generated subframes and bounded morphic images. In addition, we study modal definability in team-based logics. We study (extended) modal dependence logic, (extended) modal inclusion logic, and modal team logic. With respect to global model definability we obtain a trichotomy and with respect to frame definability a dichotomy. As a corollary we obtain relative Goldblatt--Thomason -style theorems for each of the logics listed above.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Logic, programming, and type systems · Advanced Algebra and Logic
