Planck intermediate results. XLV. Radio spectra of northern extragalactic radio sources
Planck Collaboration: P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown,, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, E., Battaner, R. Battye, K. Benabed, G. J. Bendo, A. Benoit-L\'evy, J.-P., Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, A. Bonaldi, L. Bonavera

TL;DR
This study presents multi-epoch radio spectra of 104 extragalactic sources from Planck data, revealing harder electron spectra, diverse spectral shapes, and evidence of cold dust in some sources, enhancing understanding of AGN emission.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive multi-frequency radio spectra of a large extragalactic sample using Planck and ground data, highlighting a harder electron energy spectrum than previously assumed.
Findings
High-frequency spectral indices near zero suggest a harder electron spectrum.
Spectral peaks and shapes vary across sources, indicating diverse emission mechanisms.
Detection of cold dust signatures in some low-z sources.
Abstract
Continuum spectra covering centimetre to submillimetre wavelengths are presented for a northern sample of 104 extragalactic radio sources, mainly active galactic nuclei, based on four-epoch Planck data. The nine Planck frequencies, from 30 to 857 GHz, are complemented by a set of simultaneous ground-based radio observations between 1.1 and 37 GHz. The single-survey Planck data confirm that the flattest high-frequency radio spectral indices are close to zero, indicating that the original accelerated electron energy spectrum is much harder than commonly thought, with power-law index around 1.5 instead of the canonical 2.5. The radio spectra peak at high frequencies and exhibit a variety of shapes. For a small set of low-z sources, we find a spectral upturn at high frequencies, indicating the presence of intrinsic cold dust. Variability can generally be approximated by achromatic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
