The impact of the Star Formation Histories on the SFR-M$_{*}$ relation at z$\ge$2
L. P. Cassar\`a, D. Maccagni, B. Garilli, M. Scodeggio, R. Thomas, O., Le F\`evre, G. Zamorani, D. Schaerer, B.C. Lemaux, P. Cassata, V. Le Brun, L., Pentericci, L.A.M. Tasca, E. Vanzella, E. Zucca, R. Amor\'in, S. Bardelli, M., Castellano, A. Cimatti, O. Cucciati, A. Durkalec

TL;DR
This study examines how different star formation histories influence the observed relation between stellar mass and star formation rate in high-redshift galaxies, highlighting the importance of SFH assumptions in SED fitting.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive analysis of SFH effects on the SFR-M* relation at z≥2 using a new library of models and advanced SED fitting techniques.
Findings
Most galaxies are best-fit by models with high $ au_{infall}/ u$ ratios.
The scatter in the SFR-M* relation is mainly due to SFH choices in SED fitting.
Redshift has a minor effect compared to SFH assumptions.
Abstract
In this paper we investigate the impact of different star formation histories (SFHs) on the relation between stellar mass M and star formation rate (SFR) using a sample of galaxies with reliable spectroscopic redshift zspec>2 drawn from the VIMOS Ultra-Deep Survey (VUDS). We produce an extensive database of dusty model galaxies, calculated starting from the new library of single stellar population (SSPs) models presented in Cassara' et al. 2013 and weighted by a set of 28 different SFHs based on the Schmidt function, and characterized by different ratios of the gas infall time scale to the star formation efficiency . The treatment of dust extinction and re-emission has been carried out by means of the radiative transfer calculation. The spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting technique is performed by using GOSSIP+, a tool able to combine both photometric…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
