Scientific Realism and Primordial Cosmology
Feraz Azhar, Jeremy Butterfield

TL;DR
This paper examines scientific realism in the context of primordial cosmology, discussing how early universe theories, despite observational challenges and multiverse hypotheses, still support a realist perspective.
Contribution
It offers a philosophical analysis of scientific realism through the lens of modern cosmology, focusing on early universe theories and their epistemic challenges.
Findings
Observational access to the very early universe is limited.
Multiverse theories pose challenges to empirical confirmation.
Remaining controversies do not undermine scientific realism.
Abstract
We discuss scientific realism from the perspective of modern cosmology, especially primordial cosmology: i.e. the cosmological investigation of the very early universe. We first (Section 2) state our allegiance to scientific realism, and discuss what insights about it cosmology might yield, as against "just" supplying scientific claims that philosophers can then evaluate. In particular, we discuss: the idea of laws of cosmology, and limitations on ascertaining the global structure of spacetime. Then we review some of what is now known about the early universe (Section 3): meaning, roughly, from a thousandth of a second after the Big Bang onwards(!). The rest of the paper takes up two issues about primordial cosmology, i.e. the very early universe, where "very early" means, roughly, much earlier (logarithmically) than one second after the Big Bang: say, less than seconds.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCosmology and Gravitation Theories · Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life · Earth Systems and Cosmic Evolution
