Optimal Packings of 22 and 33 Unit Squares in a Square
Wolfram Bentz

TL;DR
This paper proves that the smallest square to pack 22 and 33 unit squares has side length equal to the square root of the number of squares, confirming the most efficient packings are trivial for these cases.
Contribution
It establishes that for m=5 and 6, the minimal square side length for packing m^2-3 unit squares equals m, using a novel modification of unavoidable point sets.
Findings
s(22)=5 and s(33)=6, confirming trivial packings are optimal
Introduces a modified method of unavoidable points with continuously varying families
Supports the conjecture s(m^2-3)=m for m≥3
Abstract
Let be the side length of the smallest square into which non-overlapping unit squares can be packed. In 2010, the author showed that and . Together with the result by Keaney and Shiu, these results strongly suggest that for , in particular for the values , which correspond to cases that lie in between the previous results. In this article we show that indeed for , implying that the most efficient packings of 22 and 33 squares are the trivial ones. To achieve our results, we modify the well-known method of sets of unavoidable points by replacing them with continuously varying families of such sets.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
