Electric potential and field calculation of charged BEM triangles and rectangles by Gaussian cubature
Ferenc Gl\"uck, Daniel Hilk

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that Gaussian cubature, a numerical integration technique, can outperform traditional analytical methods in calculating electric potential and fields for charged triangles and rectangles in BEM, especially in terms of speed and accuracy.
Contribution
The paper introduces and validates the use of Gaussian cubature formulas for efficient and accurate electric potential and field calculations in BEM, with implementation on CPU and GPU.
Findings
Gaussian cubature provides high accuracy far from elements.
The method is faster than analytical integration methods.
Applicable to high-precision BEM computations.
Abstract
It is a widely held view that analytical integration is more accurate than the numerical one. In some special cases, however, numerical integration can be more advantageous than analytical integration. In our paper we show this benefit for the case of electric potential and field computation of charged triangles and rectangles applied in the boundary element method (BEM). Analytical potential and field formulas are rather complicated (even in the simplest case of constant charge densities), they have usually large computation times, and at field points far from the elements they suffer from large rounding errors. On the other hand, Gaussian cubature, which is an efficient numerical integration method, yields simple and fast potential and field formulas that are very accurate far from the elements. The simplicity of the method is demonstrated by the physical picture: the triangles and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
