The Spectral Temperature of Optically Thick Outflows with Application to Light Echo Spectra from $\eta$~Carinae's Giant Eruption
Stanley P. Owocki, Nir J. Shaviv

TL;DR
This paper revises the wind outflow model for $\eta$ Carinae's eruption, showing that a low spectral temperature around 5000K is compatible with high mass loss rates, challenging previous assumptions and aiding interpretation of light echo spectra.
Contribution
It updates the wind outflow model with new opacity data and demonstrates that low temperatures are consistent with extreme mass loss, impacting the understanding of eruptive stellar phenomena.
Findings
Low spectral temperature (~5000K) is compatible with high mass loss in wind models.
Opacity drops sharply below 6500K due to electron recombination, affecting spectral predictions.
Results are relevant for various optically thick outflows like novae, LBV eruptions, and supernova precursors.
Abstract
The detection by Rest et al. (2012) of light echoes from Carinae has provided important new observational constraints on the nature of its 1840's era giant eruption. Spectra of the echoes suggest a relatively cool spectral temperature of about 5500K, lower than the lower limit of about 7000K suggested in the optically thick wind outflow analysis of Davidson (1987). This has lead to a debate about the viability of this steady wind model relative to alternative, explosive scenarios. Here we present an updated analysis of the wind outflow model using newer low-temperature opacity tabulations and accounting for the stronger mass loss implied by the 10 Msun mass now inferred for the Homunculus. A major conclusion is that, because of the sharp drop in opacity due to free electron recombination for 6500K, a low temperature of about 5000K is compatible with, and indeed expected…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
