A Gleason-type theorem for any dimension based on a gambling formulation of Quantum Mechanics
Alessio Benavoli, Alessandro Facchini, Marco Zaffalon

TL;DR
This paper extends Gleason's theorem to all quantum system dimensions using a gambling approach, showing that only trace-based probability measures are valid and explaining why dispersion-free probabilities are invalid.
Contribution
It introduces a Gleason-type theorem applicable to any dimension, including two, based on a gambling formulation of quantum mechanics, and clarifies the invalidity of dispersion-free probabilities.
Findings
Gleason-type theorem holds for all dimensions, including n=2
Only trace-based probability assignments are consistent with quantum mechanics
Dispersion-free probabilities are shown to be invalid in quantum theory
Abstract
Based on a gambling formulation of quantum mechanics, we derive a Gleason-type theorem that holds for any dimension n of a quantum system, and in particular for n = 2. The theorem states that the only logically consistent probability assignments are exactly the ones that are definable as the trace of the product of a projector and a density matrix operator. In addition, we detail the reason why dispersion-free probabilities are actually not valid, or rational, probabilities for quantum mechanics, and hence should be excluded from consideration.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
