Decidable Characterization of FO2(<,+1) and locality of DA
Thomas Place, Luc Segoufin

TL;DR
This paper provides a new, simplified proof that determining whether a language is definable in FO2(<,+1) is decidable, and as a consequence, it establishes the locality of the variety DA.
Contribution
It introduces a self-contained, simplified proof of FO2(<,+1) definability decidability and derives the locality of DA as a corollary.
Findings
Decidability of FO2(<,+1) definability established.
Simplified proof method introduced.
Locality of DA proved as a corollary.
Abstract
Several years ago Th\'erien and Wilke exhibited a decidable characterization of the languages of words that are definable in FO2(<,+1). Their proof relies on three separate ingredients. The first one is the characterization of the languages that are definable in FO2(<) as those whose syntactic semigroup belongs to the variety DA. Then, this result is combined with a wreath product argument showing that being definable in FO2(<,+1) corresponds to having a syntactic semigroup in DA*D. Finally, proving that membership of a semigroup in DA*D is decidable requires a third ingredient: the "locality" of DA, a result proved by Almeida. In this note we present a new self-contained and simple proof that definability in FO2(<,+1) is decidable. We obtain the locality of DA as a corollary.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicssemigroups and automata theory
