Bubbles of Nothing and Supersymmetric Compactifications
Jose J. Blanco-Pillado, Benjamin Shlaer, Kepa Sousa, Jon Urrestilla

TL;DR
This paper explores the non-perturbative stability of supersymmetric compactifications against bubble of nothing decay, revealing a dynamical suppression mechanism that enforces stability even when topological obstructions are absent.
Contribution
It demonstrates a new dynamical suppression mechanism preventing decay of supersymmetric vacua in topologically unobstructed cases, supported by a four-dimensional supergravity toy model.
Findings
Supersymmetric compactifications can be unstable to bubble of nothing decay without topological obstructions.
A suppression mechanism analogous to Coleman-De Luccia prevents decay near the supersymmetric limit.
The circumference of the bubble diverges as supersymmetry is approached, halting decay.
Abstract
We investigate the non-perturbative stability of supersymmetric compactifications with respect to decay via a bubble of nothing. We show examples where this kind of instability is not prohibited by the spin structure, i.e., periodicity of fermions about the extra dimension. However, such "topologically unobstructed" cases do exhibit an extra-dimensional analog of the well-known Coleman-De Luccia suppression mechanism, which prohibits the decay of supersymmetric vacua. We demonstrate this explicitly in a four dimensional Abelian-Higgs toy model coupled to supergravity. The compactification of this model to presents the possibility of vacua with different windings for the scalar field. Away from the supersymmetric limit, these states decay by the formation of a bubble of nothing, dressed with an Abelian-Higgs vortex. We show how, as one approaches the supersymmetric…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
