Mid-J CO Shock Tracing Observations of Infrared Dark Clouds III: SLED fitting
A. Pon, M. J. Kaufman, D. Johnstone, P. Caselli, F. Fontani, M. J., Butler, I. Jim\'enez-Serra, A. Palau, J. C. Tan

TL;DR
This study investigates mid-J CO line emissions in infrared dark clouds, demonstrating that shock models better explain the hot gas component than PDR models, with implications for understanding turbulence and feedback in molecular clouds.
Contribution
The paper introduces shock models for low-velocity C-type shocks to explain mid-J CO emissions, highlighting the hot gas component in IRDCs beyond PDR predictions.
Findings
Mid-J CO lines are dominated by shock-heated gas.
Shock models with densities near 10^4.5 cm^(-3) fit observations well.
Hot gas filling factor is approximately 0.1% in observed regions.
Abstract
Giant molecular clouds contain supersonic turbulence that can locally heat small fractions of gas to over 100 K. We run shock models for low-velocity, C-type shocks propagating into gas with densities between 10^3 and 10^5 cm^(-3) and find that CO lines are the most important cooling lines. Comparison to photodissociation region (PDR) models indicates that mid-J CO lines (J = 8-7 and higher) should be dominated by emission from shocked gas. In Papers I and II we presented CO J = 3-2, 8-7, and 9-8 observations toward four primarily quiescent clumps within infrared dark clouds. Here we fit PDR models to the combined spectral line energy distributions and show that the PDR models that best fit the low-J CO emission underpredict the mid-J CO emission by orders of magnitude, strongly hinting at a hot gas component within these clumps. The low-J CO data clearly show that the integrated…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
