Cosmic reionization after Planck II: contribution from quasars
Sourav Mitra, T. Roy Choudhury, Andrea Ferrara

TL;DR
This study reevaluates quasars' role in cosmic reionization using updated Planck data and recent AGN discoveries, concluding that quasars alone cannot account for reionization without conflicting with HeII Ly-$\\alpha$ forest observations.
Contribution
The paper extends a semi-analytic reionization model to incorporate recent data, demonstrating that quasar-dominated reionization scenarios are inconsistent with observations, favoring a mixed galaxy-quasar contribution.
Findings
Quasars alone cannot reionize the universe without conflicting with HeII Ly-$\alpha$ data.
Models with high AGN emissivities predict early HeII reionization and slow HeII Ly-$\alpha$ evolution, which are observationally inconsistent.
A standard two-component model with galaxy contributions and a non-zero escape fraction fits the data well.
Abstract
In the light of the recent Planck downward revision of the electron scattering optical depth, and of the discovery of a faint AGN population at , we reassess the actual contribution of quasars to cosmic reionization. To this aim, we extend our previous MCMC-based data-constrained semi-analytic reionization model and study the role of quasars on global reionization history. We find that, the quasars can alone reionize the Universe only for models with very high AGN emissivities at high redshift. These models are still allowed by the recent CMB data and most of the observations related to HI reionization. However, they predict an extended and early HeII reionization ending at and a much slower evolution in the mean HeII Ly- forest opacity than what the actual observation suggests. Thus when we further constrain our model against the HeII Ly- forest data,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
